me news

top 2012

tis the season of ‘top’ everything lists, here’s the rick poynor top 10 design books one, a couple i would agree with but perhaps i should just make my own list instead

m / 07-12-2012 15:00 - tags: , ,  

the cortical homunculus (translated)

i have finally got round to translating the piece on ‘tactile design’ i wrote for papier hier back in august, see below…

Tactility

See this: the ‘Cortical Homunculus’ an amusing name and a fascinating depiction (or is it an infographic?) of the relationship between the body and the mind, or rather a kind of google maps of the senses. I stumbled upon it via Wikipedia in search of a definition of the term tactile. Exactly what does it mean?. Funnily enough Wikipedia didn’t have an answer, although i did find this piece:

Touch (in the tactile sense) is the ability of an organism to perceive (or acknowledge) pressure. This senses’ ability to perceive is called feeling.

Right, exactly…

Soon afterwards I realised that ‘Papier Hier’ is organised by a paper distributor. Antalis, a company that is highly connected to the term ‘tactile’. So I politely decided to look it up in an old (lovely, stale-smelling) dictionary printed on 60 grams rough uncoated stock and there it was; brief, clear and understandable:

“tactile: tangible, touchable” aha… I see

Tactile design. On the one hand a rather fashionable term in design circles since the past say 3, 4, 5, or 6 years. Also a term that has kept design book publishers pretty busy. In my opinion it is a term that can be rather broadly interpreted. Certainly in a field like design that is so susceptible to the winds of change, fresh ideas / visions and the latest ‘new black’.

Full disclosure: I am a designer and much of my own work also gets described (by others) in that fashion. Visitors, students and journalists always seem to be most preoccupied with those parts of my work that could be deemed to be ‘tactile’. Whichever way you look at it; it is definitely a phenomenon that is ‘in the air’ right now, of which more later.

Although when it comes to tactility, much like other trendy terms (such as infographics) there really is nothing new under the sun. Take for example, the renowned ‘boek van ptt’ created by Piet Zwart in 1938. He, in turn, was strongly influenced by the russian avant-garde and everything that was ‘in flux’ in the art world at that time. His book is, for me, a rare and admirable example of how a playful mind plus an urge to experiment can lead to innovation.

On the other hand the considerable interest in tactility, haptic design, revival of old & forgotten techniques and handmade work is a logical and easily explained shift in this digital age. Screens are playing a greater and greater role in how people come into contact with design. Separated from each other by a thin sheet of glass, perhaps we are aching more than ever for a tangible environment. Not just for rather shabby visual metaphors like fake e-book pages that ‘turn’ or cameras bereft of moving parts that say ‘click’ when you shoot.

We are searching for authenticity and tangible experiences, to once again use the whole spectrum of our senses. The world is becoming more complex and movement in one direction inevitably leads to movement occurring in the opposite sense. What i have noticed personally is that the younger generation (the so-called digital natives) are the most fanatical when it comes to finding new forms of expression beyond merely their (native) digital one. A noteworthy and highly interesting observation to my mind.

Newborn babies are fleetingly (almost) blind and instinctively forced into using the remaining senses: taste, smell and sound. In other words, it’s in our nature. Embracing other methods to express myself & learning new processes has at least in my own case lead to a richer, more playful, uncertain and exciting range of experiences. It has never been a question of being anti-computer, quite the opposite. Rather a question of making sure i have all of the available options at my disposal and making sure i employ them too.

Terms that come to mind when considering the word ‘tactile’:

• hands on, physical, sensory
• revealing & dissecting the process, a disregard for perfection
• playfulness, temporary
• more honest and individual work
• employing more dimensions, more depth
• more realistic, authentic, approachable, touchable
• celebrate humanity and imperfection instead of fearing them

Perhaps tactility isn’t just a question of touch but rather about our ability to ‘feel’. How something comes about, what it represents, our capacity for empathy and how we explain and share the things that matter with each other.
That would certainly feel good.

me studio, 24th aug. ’12

m / 03-12-2012 09:42 - tags: , ,  

the cortical homunculus (translated)

i have finally got round to translating the piece on ‘tactile design’ i wrote for papier hier back in august, see below…

Tactility

See this: the ‘Cortical Homunculus’ an amusing name and a fascinating depiction (or is it an infographic?) of the relationship between the body and the mind, or rather a kind of google maps of the senses. I stumbled upon it via Wikipedia in search of a definition of the term tactile. Exactly what does it mean?. Funnily enough Wikipedia didn’t have an answer, although i did find this piece:

Touch (in the tactile sense) is the ability of an organism to perceive (or acknowledge) pressure. This senses’ ability to perceive is called feeling.

Right, exactly…

Soon afterwards I realised that ‘Papier Hier’ is organised by a paper distributor. Antalis, a company that is highly connected to the term ‘tactile’. So I politely decided to look it up in an old (lovely, stale-smelling) dictionary printed on 60 grams rough uncoated stock and there it was; brief, clear and understandable:

“tactile: tangible, touchable” aha… I see

Tactile design. On the one hand a rather fashionable term in design circles since the past say 3, 4, 5, or 6 years. Also a term that has kept design book publishers pretty busy. In my opinion it is a term that can be rather broadly interpreted. Certainly in a field like design that is so susceptible to the winds of change, fresh ideas / visions and the latest ‘new black’.

Full disclosure: I am a designer and much of my own work also gets described (by others) in that fashion. Visitors, students and journalists always seem to be most preoccupied with those parts of my work that could be deemed to be ‘tactile’. Whichever way you look at it; it is definitely a phenomenon that is ‘in the air’ right now, of which more later.

Although when it comes to tactility, much like other trendy terms (such as infographics) there really is nothing new under the sun. Take for example, the renowned ‘boek van ptt’ created by Piet Zwart in 1938. He, in turn, was strongly influenced by the russian avant-garde and everything that was ‘in flux’ in the art world at that time. His book is, for me, a rare and admirable example of how a playful mind plus an urge to experiment can lead to innovation.

On the other hand the considerable interest in tactility, haptic design, revival of old & forgotten techniques and handmade work is a logical and easily explained shift in this digital age. Screens are playing a greater and greater role in how people come into contact with design. Separated from each other by a thin sheet of glass, perhaps we are aching more than ever for a tangible environment. Not just for rather shabby visual metaphors like fake e-book pages that ‘turn’ or cameras bereft of moving parts that say ‘click’ when you shoot.

We are searching for authenticity and tangible experiences, to once again use the whole spectrum of our senses. The world is becoming more complex and movement in one direction inevitably leads to movement occurring in the opposite sense. What i have noticed personally is that the younger generation (the so-called digital natives) are the most fanatical when it comes to finding new forms of expression beyond merely their (native) digital one. A noteworthy and highly interesting observation to my mind.

Newborn babies are fleetingly (almost) blind and instinctively forced into using the remaining senses: taste, smell and sound. In other words, it’s in our nature. Embracing other methods to express myself & learning new processes has at least in my own case lead to a richer, more playful, uncertain and exciting range of experiences. It has never been a question of being anti-computer, quite the opposite. Rather a question of making sure i have all of the available options at my disposal and making sure i employ them too.

Terms that come to mind when considering the word ‘tactile’:

• hands on, physical, sensory
• revealing & dissecting the process, a disregard for perfection
• playfulness, temporary
• more honest and individual work
• employing more dimensions, more depth
• more realistic, authentic, approachable, touchable
• celebrate humanity and imperfection instead of fearing them

Perhaps tactility isn’t just a question of touch but rather about our ability to ‘feel’. How something comes about, what it represents, our capacity for empathy and how we explain and share the things that matter with each other.
That would certainly feel good.

me studio, 24th aug. ’12

m / 03-12-2012 09:40 - tags: , ,  

the foreign legion

…today can be better than yesterday…
according to foreign legion: a group of idealistic students who wish to make the world a better place by working for free, at least without the restraints of commercial and economic factors, sounds familiar… at least i know a few clients who would be interested in free work that’s for sure…

m / 03-12-2012 09:23 - tags: , ,  

talking tactile (first posted 23 nov ’12)

i promised several people that i would post a list of the stuff i mentioned last week at the ‘papier hier’ talk and here it is, probably a meaningless list of websites unless you were there, the topic was ‘tactile’ and these are some of the people and projects i spoke about in that context…

‘boven kamers’ book by moon brouwer

‘happy faces’ by dennis van gaalen

posters from sergio alves

the wonderful toaster project by thomas thwaites

the austria solar annual report

underwater images by alberto seveso

fictional film sets by daniel agdag

tactile photography dan tobin smith

tactile photography bela borsodi

swiss artist ‘bernard voïta’ (hard to find, google him…)

swiss artist felice varini

human trees by jody xiong

string art from gabriel dawe

toilet roll art from junior fritz jacquet

tactile typography by marian bantjes

intricate layouts and paper objects from peter nencini

nail art chen chun hao (or google him)

nail art goshka macuga

‘balancing blocks’ short by part & parcel

‘bag charms’ by christian borstlap

‘frictions’ short by steven briand

and here above is me together with mister ian wright whom i certainly would have mentioned in my talk, except that he was already invited as a guest speaker that day…
(image above courtesy of ‘willie kerkhof’)